when doing the month end batch-job) Should I pay up a full licence? Surely not!ģ) One of the cool things about virtualisation, is that you can keep your tasks isolated in a VM (no matter how small the task may be), while still reaping the benefits of a consolidated server environment. All users on Osnews will slam the report as being “biased”).Ģ) What happens when we start to add resources dynamically (f.ex. (I predict that Gartner will come up with a best-practice report on virtualisation licencing management. Who cares what HW I am running my OS on, as long as I am only running one instance.īut as virtualisation techniques matures, I think that there will be some major problems with this model:ġ) The more fluid my architechture becomes, the harder it will be to track licence use. I think that this is fair enough.Īctually, I have always meant that SMP licencing was bloody unfair. If you are running several instances, you are essentially running several servers (despite the fact, that the servers are only running on one physical machine). So, as long as you are running one instance of the OS (like on dual cores) you are only paying for one licence. ![]() Virtual machines -> Treated as separate instances ![]() …but still I see some future problems with this model.ĭual core -> Treated as one CPU (one OS instance)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |